CO129-308 - Public Offices - 1901 — Page 250

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed
Series Prev Next

117171 lacce

X.

Pes 17 MAY 01

The Marquess of Lansdowne to Sir Chihchen Loféngluh.

243

Foreign Office, April 26, 1901. WITH reference to my note of the 1st February last, I have the honour to inform you that a Report has been received from the Governor of Hong Kong on the subject of the alleged agitation against the Chinese Government in that Colony.

Sir H. Blake states that, so far as the police can ascertain, no active agitation exists, and he is informed that Kang Yu Wei's party is in favour of reform in the direction of purity of administration, and not of rebellion.

With reference to the mention made in your note of the 14th January of the discovery of Kang Yu Wei's connection with the dynamite explosion which occurred in the Yamên of the Governor at Canton last year, Sir H. Blake states that he has heard nothing to show that Kang Yu Wei was in any way implicated in that outrage.

I have, &c. (Signed) LANSDOWNE.

Page 243

The Marquess of Lansdowne to Sir Chihchen Loféngluh.

Foreign Office, April 26, 1901. WITH reference to my note of the 1st February last, I have the honour to inform you that a Report has been received from the Governor of Hong Kong on the subject of the alleged agitation against the Chinese Government in that Colony.

Sir H. Blake states that, so far as the police can ascertain, no active agitation exists, and he is informed that Kang Yu Wei's party is in favour of reform in the direction of purity of administration, and not of rebellion.

With reference to the mention made in your note of the 14th January of the discovery of Kang Yu Wei's connection with the dynamite explosion which occurred in the Yamên of the Governor at Canton last year, Sir H. Blake states that he has heard nothing to show that Kang Yu Wei was in any way implicated in that outrage.

I have, &c. (Signed) LANSDOWNE.

Page 244

Edit History

2026-06-01 04:34:51 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
117171 lacce X. Pes 17 MAY 01 The Marquess of Lansdowne to Sir Chihchen Loféngluh. 243 Foreign Office, April 26, 1901. WITH reference to my note of the 1st February last, I have the honour to inform you that a Report has been received from the Governor of Hong Kong on the subject of the alleged agitation against the Chinese Government in that Colony. Sir H. Blake states that, so far as the police can ascertain, no active agitation exists, and he is informed that Kang Yu Wei's party is in favour of reform in the direction of purity of administration, and not of rebellion. With reference to the mention made in your note of the 14th January of the discovery of Kang Yu Wei's connection with the dynamite explosion which occurred in the Yamên of the Governor at Canton last year, Sir H. Blake states that he has heard nothing to show that Kang Yu Wei was in any way implicated in that outrage. I have, &c. (Signed) LANSDOWNE. Page 243 The Marquess of Lansdowne to Sir Chihchen Loféngluh. Foreign Office, April 26, 1901. WITH reference to my note of the 1st February last, I have the honour to inform you that a Report has been received from the Governor of Hong Kong on the subject of the alleged agitation against the Chinese Government in that Colony. Sir H. Blake states that, so far as the police can ascertain, no active agitation exists, and he is informed that Kang Yu Wei's party is in favour of reform in the direction of purity of administration, and not of rebellion. With reference to the mention made in your note of the 14th January of the discovery of Kang Yu Wei's connection with the dynamite explosion which occurred in the Yamên of the Governor at Canton last year, Sir H. Blake states that he has heard nothing to show that Kang Yu Wei was in any way implicated in that outrage. I have, &c. (Signed) LANSDOWNE. Page 244
Baseline (Original)
C. 0. 117171 lacce X. Pes 17 MAY 01 The Marquess of Lansdowne to Sir Chihchen Loféngluh. 243 Foreign Office, April 26, 1901. WITH reference to my note of the 1st February last, I have the honour to inform ou that a Report has been received from the Governor of Hong Kong on the subject of the alleged agitation against the Chinese Government in that Colony. Sir H. Blake states that, so far as the police can ascertain, no active agitation exists, and he is informed that Kang Yu Wei's party is in favour of reform in the direction of purity of administration, and not of rebellion. With reference to the mention made in your note of the 14th January of the discovery of Kang Yu Wei's connection with the dynamite explosion which occurred in the Yamên of the Governor at Canton last year, Sir H. Blake states that he has heard nothing to show that Kang Yu Wei was in any way implicated in that outrage. I have, &c. (Signed) LANSDOWNE. Sir, The Marquess of Lansdowne to Sir Chihchen Loféngluh. Foreign Office, April 26, 1901. WITH reference to my note of the 1st February last, I have the honour to inform you that a Report has been received from the Governor of Hong Kong on the subject of the alleged agitation against the Chinese Government in that Colony. Sir H. Blake states that, so far as the police can ascertain, no active agitation exists, and he is informed that Kang Yu Wei's party is in favour of reform in the direction of purity of administration, and not of rebellion. With reference to the mention made in your note of the 14th January of the discovery of Kang Yu Wei's connection with the dynamite explosion which occurred in the Yamên of the Governor at Canton last year, Sir H. Blake states that he has heard nothing to show that Kang Yu Wei was in any way implicated in that outrage. I have, &c. (Signed) LANSDOWNE.
2026-06-01 04:34:51 · Baseline
View content

C. 0.

117171 lacce

X.

Pes 17 MAY 01

The Marquess of Lansdowne to Sir Chihchen Loféngluh.

243

Foreign Office, April 26, 1901. WITH reference to my note of the 1st February last, I have the honour to inform ou that a Report has been received from the Governor of Hong Kong on the subject

of the alleged agitation against the Chinese Government in that Colony.

Sir H. Blake states that, so far as the police can ascertain, no active agitation exists, and he is informed that Kang Yu Wei's party is in favour of reform in the direction of purity of administration, and not of rebellion.

With reference to the mention made in your note of the 14th January of the discovery of Kang Yu Wei's connection with the dynamite explosion which occurred in the Yamên of the Governor at Canton last year, Sir H. Blake states that he has heard nothing to show that Kang Yu Wei was in any way implicated in that outrage.

I have, &c. (Signed)

LANSDOWNE.

Sir,

The Marquess of Lansdowne to Sir Chihchen Loféngluh.

Foreign Office, April 26, 1901. WITH reference to my note of the 1st February last, I have the honour to inform you that a Report has been received from the Governor of Hong Kong on the subject

of the alleged agitation against the Chinese Government in that Colony.

Sir H. Blake states that, so far as the police can ascertain, no active agitation exists, and he is informed that Kang Yu Wei's party is in favour of reform in the direction of purity of administration, and not of rebellion.

With reference to the mention made in your note of the 14th January of the discovery of Kang Yu Wei's connection with the dynamite explosion which occurred in the Yamên of the Governor at Canton last year, Sir H. Blake states that he has heard nothing to show that Kang Yu Wei was in any way implicated in that outrage.

I have, &c. (Signed) LANSDOWNE.

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.